SUMMARY STATISTICS OF STUDENT EVALUATIONS

Questions are graded from 0 (Worst) to 4 (Best) Scale. There are 40 questions. The responses of the questions are summarized into the following five categories: 1. Delivery and Teaching, 2. Learning Goals, 3. Interaction such as responsiveness, willingness to help, 4. Grading style and Fairness, 5, Evluation which is the mean of the first fours categories and finally 6. Instructor Effectiveness (Question #40) or Q40 as it is known at Wazzu.

Fall 1998

Economics 301: Theory of the Firm and Market Policy

Variable	My Mean	5 YearAverage	Dept. Mean	College Mean
1. Delivery	3.49	2.68	2.97	3.00
2. Learning	3.24	2.69	2.97	2.99
3. Interaction	3.69	2.99	3.32	3.28
4. Grading	3.51	2.85	3.16	3.06
5. Evaluation (Average1,2,3 and 4)	3.44	2.67	3.00	2.98
6. Effectiveness	3.52	2.37	2.90	2.87

Fall 1998 Economics 592: Managerial Economics (For MBA's)

Variable	My Mean	5 Year Average	Dept. Mean	College Mean
1. Delivery	2.99	2.62	2.97	3.00
2. Learning	2.85	2.69	2.97	2.99
3. Interaction	3.33	2.86	3.32	3.28
4. Grading	2.90	2.50	3.16	3.06
5. Evaluation (Average of 1,2,3 and 4)	2.94	2.52	3.00	2.98
6. Effectiveness	3.09	2.22	2.90	2.87

Indiana Uniersity-Purdue University-Indianapolis

All Questions are graded on a 1 (Worst) to 5 (Best) scale. The percentge rabnk reflects what percent of instructors in the department and those teaching a same (300) level course scored BELOW my mean.

Spring 1998 Econ 303: International Economics


	Question		My Mean		Percentage Rank

						Dept. Dept. 300 Level
Instructor organized 
the course well			4.46		80	89

Instructor explains
subject clearly			4.62		98	100

Instructor displays
enthusiasm when teaching	4.77		93	100

Instructor stimulates
my thinking			4.62		100	100

Instructor is 
knowledgeable on course topics	4.92		100	100

Instructor is fair and
impartial			4.54		85	89

 I would recommend
this instructor			4.31		76	67

 Course content 
appropirate for stated 
objectives			4.54		100	100

Grading procedures
are fair			4.46		93	100

Course improved my
understanding  of concepts
in the field			4.31		85	89

Would recommend this
course				4.23		85	89

ALL QUESTIONS ARE GRADED ON A SCALE FROM 1 (WORST) TO 5 (BEST)

Fall 1993 Introduction to Microeconomics

QUESTION                          SECTION MEAN    DEPTT. MEAN    100 LEVEL MEAN


The instructor was prepared    4.29           4.13          4.20
for class and presented the 
material in an organized manner

The instructor responded       4.30           3.98          4.12
effectively to student
comments and questions

The instructor generated       3.99           3.75          3.83
interest in the course
material

The instructor had a           4.37           4.04          4.21
positive attitude towards
assisting all students in
understanding course material

The instructor assigned        4.30           3.96          4.16 
grades fairly

The instructional method       3.88           3.62          3.70
encouraged student learning

I rate the teaching            4.39           3.85          3.95
effectiveness of the instructor 
as

Spring 1994 Introduction to Macroeconomics

                

     QUESTION                   SECTION MEAN     DEPTT. MEAN    100 LEVEL MEAN


The instructor was prepared    4.74          4.18            4.13
for class and presented 
material in an organized manner


  
The instructor responded      4.75          4.09             4.09  
effectively to student 
comments and questions


The instructor generated      4.50          3.85              3.79
interest in the course 
material


The instructor had a positive 4.81          4.16              4.18 
attitude towards assisting all
students in understanding
course material


The instructor assigned       4.69          4.11             4.17  
grades fairly                     


The instructional methods     4.51          3.74             3.69
encouraged student learning


I rate the teaching           4.77          3.97             3.91
effectiveness of the instructor
as

Summer 1994 Introduction to Micreconomics


   QUESTION                   SECTION MEAN       DEPTT. MEAN    100 LEVEL MEAN



The instructor was prepared   4.22           4.08               3.98
for class and presented the 
material in an organized 
manner


The instructor responded      4.09           3.91               3.80
effectively to student 
comments and questions


The instructor generated      3.69           3.66               3.56
interest in the course
material


The instructor had a positive 4.16           4.14               4.07
attitude towards assisting
all students in understanding 
course material


The instructor assigned       4.03           3.96              3.95
grades fairly 


The instructional methods     3.47           3.55               3.37
encouraged student learning


I rate the teaching           3.87           3.82              3.64
effectiveness of the 
instructor as

Fall 1994 Introdcution to Microeconomics


    QUESTION                 SECTION MEAN        DEPTT. MEAN     100 LEVEL MEAN



The instructor was prepared  4.67           4.27              3.98
for class and presented 
material in an organized 
manner


The instructor responded     4.68           4.10              4.11
effectively to student
comments and questions


The instructor generated     4.48           3.84              3.89
interest in the course
material


The instructor had a         4.67           4.18              4.21
Positive attitude towards 
assisting all students in 
understanding course material


The instructor assigned      4.65           4.06              4.15
grades fairly


The instructional methods    4.45           3.71              3.75
encouraged student learning


I rate the teaching          4.66           3.97              4.03
effectiveness of the instuctor
as

Spring 1995 Introduction to Macroeconomics

QUESTION                      SECTION MEAN       DEPTT. MEAN     100 LEVEL MEAN


The instructor was prepared      4.61         4.24             4.34
for class and presented the 
material in an organized
manner


The instructor responded         4.42         4.14             4.21
effectively to student comments 
and questions 


The instructor generated         4.67         3.90             3.95
interest in the course
material


The instructor had a             4.40         4.20             4.25
positive attitude 
towards assisting all
students in understanding
course material


The instructor assigned          4.60         4.07             4.14
grades fairly


The instructional methods        4.23         3.77              3.83
encouraged student learning


I rate the teaching              4.47         4.03              4.1
effectiveness of the 
instructor as

Fall 1995 Introduction to Microeconomics

QUESTION                         SECTION MEAN    DEPTT. MEAN    100 LEVEL MEAN


The instructor was                4.44        4.15            4.23
prepared for class and 
presented the material in 
an organized manner


The instructor responded          4.11        3.99            4.01
effectively to student
comments and questions


The instructor generated          4.21        3.75            3.78 
interest in the course
material


The instructor had a              4.22        4.10            4.14
positive attitude towards
assisting all students in 
understanding course material


The instructor assigned           4.11        3.99            4.11
grades fairly


The instructional methods         3.78        3.61            3.65
encouraged student learning


I rate the teaching               4.08        3.84            3.91
effectiveness of the instructor 
as

Spring 1996 Introduction to Microeconomics


QUESTION			SECTION MEAN  	DEPTT. MEAN	100 LEVEL MEAN


The instructor was		4.60	   4.23		   4.27
prepared for class and 
presented the matter in an 
organized manner

The instructor responded	4.51	   4.04		   4.05
effectively to student comments 
and questions

The instructor generated	4.56	   3.82		   3.78
interest in the course
material

The instructor had		4.63	   4.12		   4.13
a positive attitude towards
assisting all students in
understanding the course
material

The instructor assigned 	4.49	   4.03		   4.07
grades fairly

The instructional methods	4.26	   3.68		   3.65
encouraged student learning

I rate the teaching		4.58	   3.93		   3.93 
effectiveness of the 
instructor as

Back to my Home Page